Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jocmr.elmerjournals.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 7-8, August 2024, pages 363-374


A Complex Interplay of Tumor Microenvironment Could Enhance Cholangiocarcinoma Progression Even After Surgery: A Prospective Study

Figures

↓  Figure 1. Flow cytometric detection of the checkpoint expression on T cells. (a) Forward and side scatter histogram was used to define monocytes and lymphocytes population. (b) CD68 and CD11b were assessed on the monocyte population to detect total macrophage. (c) Then CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells were assessed on lymphocytes and then gated. (d, e) The expression of CD279 (PD-1) was assessed on CD4+ and CD8+ cells. PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Differential expression of PD-1 and macrophages between patients and healthy controls. Data are analyzed by Mann Whitney U-test. PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. PFS of 25 metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. PFS: progression-free survival
Figure 3.
↓  Figure 4. Differential expression of immune cells between single and multiple sites of metastasis (Mann-Whitney test). PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; MPR: mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio.
Figure 4.
↓  Figure 5. Differential expression of CD11bCD68+ macrophages according to the macroscopic pattern (Kruskal Wallis test, P = 0.037).
Figure 5.
↓  Figure 6. Differential accumulation of immune cells according to grading. PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; MPR: mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio.
Figure 6.
↓  Figure 7. Differential expression of immune cells according to previous surgery. PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; MPR: mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio.
Figure 7.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Demographic Data of Patients
 
Demographic data Descriptive
Data are expressed as mean, median, SD, number, and percentages, as well as ECOG. ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status; SD: standard deviation; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; HTN: hypertension.
Age (median) 59 years
  Mean ± SD 56.6 ± 10.8 years
  Min -Max 34 - 77 years
Sex (male/female) 13/12 (1.1/1)
ECOG-PS
  PS = 0 9 (36%)
  PS = 1 - 2 16 (64%)
BMI
  Underweight 9 (36%)
  Normal weight 6 (24%)
  Overweight 10 (40%)
Smoking
  None 12 (48%)
  Smoker 4 (16%)
  Ex-smoker 9 (36%)
Comorbidities
  None 2 (8%)
  Diabetic 6 (24%)
  Hypertensive 11 (44%)
  Both DM and HTN 6 (24%)

 

↓  Table 2. Clinicopathologic Characteristics
 
Characteristics Descriptive
Data are expressed as numbers and percentages. CCA: cholangiocarcinoma; iCCA: intrahepatic CCA; pCCA: perihilar CCA; dCCA: distal CCA.
Primary site
  dCCA 10 (40%)
  pCCA 10 (40%)
  iCCA 5 (20%)
Sites of metastasis
  Single site 17 (68%)
  Multiple sites 8 (32%)
Macroscopic pattern
  Mass-forming 5 (20%)
  Periductal-infiltrating 7 (28%)
  Intraductal-growing 13 (52%)
Grading of CCA
  G1 4 (16%)
  G2 10 (40%)
  G3 11 (44%)
Previous surgery
  No surgery 12 (48%)
  Radical surgery 6 (24%)
  Palliative surgery 7 (28%)
Response
  Complete response 9 (36%)
  Partial response 5 (20%)
  Stable disease 7 (28%)
  Progressive disease 4 (16%)
Outcome
  Dead 10 (40%)
  Alive 15 (60%)

 

↓  Table 3. Comparison Between Patients and Controls Regarding Hematologic Indices
 
Index Groups Mean ± SD P value
Data are expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed by Mann-Whitney test. SD: standard deviation; RBCs: red blood cells; Hb: hemoglobin; WBCs: white blood cells; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; MPV: mean platelet volume; MPR: mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio.
RBC Patients 4.2 ± 0.43 0.012
Healthy controls 4.8 ± 1.0
Hb Patients 11.7 ± 1.2 0.038
Healthy controls 13.01 ± 2.3
WBCs Patients 6.85 ± 3.7 0.012
Healthy controls 10.15 ± 4.7
Neutrophils, % Patients 75.37 ± 8.9 0.6
Healthy controls 77.14 ± 15.4
Lymphocytes, % Patients 17.97 ± 5.6 0.4
Healthy controls 15.27 ± 11.8
Monocytes, % Patients 4.99 ± 3.4 0.05
Healthy controls 7.84 ± 6.0
Platelet count Patients 181.44 ± 44.8 < 0.001
Healthy controls 278.1 ± 114.5
MPV Patients 9.64 ± 1.2 0.001
Healthy controls 10.89 ± 1.1
NLR Patients 4.7 ± 1.9 0.012
Healthy controls 8.5 ± 5.7
MPR Patients 0.057 ± 0.02 0.8
Healthy controls 0.059 ± 0.07

 

↓  Table 4. Correlations Between Survival and PD-1 Expression and Macrophages
 
Variable PFS CD4+ CD4+PD-1+ CD8+ CD8+PD-1+ CD11b+CD68+ NLR MPR
aSignificant. Spearman rho correlation, r: correlation coefficient. PFS: progression-free survival; PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; MPR: mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio; M: macrophages.
PFS r 1 0.472a -0.262 0.088 -0.428a -0.213 -0.48a 0.133
P 0.017 0.205 0.677 0.033 0.308 0.015 0.526
CD4+ r 0.472a 1 -0.593 -0.084 -0.280 -0.569 -0.2 -0.11
P 0.017 0.002 0.689 0.175 0.003 0.453 0.587
CD4+PD-1+ r -0.262 -0.593 1 0.152 0.544 0.300 0.030 -0.1
P 0.205 0.002 0.468 0.005 0.146 0.888 0.646
CD8+ T cells r 0.088 -0.084 0.152 1 0.241 0.246 -0.15 -0.32
P 0.677 0.689 0.468 0.246 0.236 0.462 0.116
CD8+PD-1+ r -0.43a -0.280 0.544 0.241 1 0.29 -0.15 -0.26
P 0.033 0.175 0.005 0.246 0.163 0.475 0.206
CD11b+CD68+ M r -0.213 -0.569 0.300 0.246 0.288 1 -0.3 0.258
P 0.308 0.003 0.146 0.236 0.163 0.199 0.212
NLR r -0.5a -0.157 0.030 -0.154 -0.150 -0.27 1 -0.3
P 0.015 0.453 0.888 0.462 0.475 0.199 0.191
MPR r 0.133 -0.114 -0.097 -0.322 -0.262 0.258 -0.27 1
P 0.526 0.587 0.646 0.116 0.206 0.212 0.191

 

↓  Table 5. Disturbance of Immune Cells According to Responses to Treatment
 
Immune cells Complete response Partial response Stable disease Progressive disease P value
Data are expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed by Robust test. NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; MPR: mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio; M: macrophages; SD: standard deviation; PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1.
CD4+ T cells Mean ± SD 38.1 ± 5.8 25.3 ± 4.5 21.7 ± 4.9 19.33 ± 10.6 0.001
CD4+PD-1+ Mean ± SD 11.77 ±13.4 39.5 ± 32.2 32.47 ± 16.8 55.1 ± 27.9 0.04
CD8+ T cells Mean ± SD 15.77 ± 7.1 18.8 ± 4.2 19.5 ± 5.2 21.5 ± 14.3 0.7
CD8+PD-1+ Mean ± SD 14.8 ± 8.5 18.9 ± 3.3 17.37 ± 7.4 66.53 ± 19.8 0.008
CD11b+CD68+ M Mean ± SD 12.9 ± 2.3 16.5 ± 13.2 45.69 ± 20.8 39.0 ± 4.6 < 0.001
NLR Mean ± SD 4.2 ± 0.9 5.3 ± 1.8 4.93 ± 3.0 5.0 ± 1.9 0.6
MPR Mean ± SD 0.06 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.02 0.06 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.03 0.7

 

↓  Table 6. Differential Expression of Immune Cells According to Grading
 
Variable G1 G2 G3 P value
Data are expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed by Robust test. M: macrophages; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; MPR: mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio; SD: standard deviation; PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1.
CD4+ T cells Mean ± SD 36.3 ± 3.1 26.3 ± 8.9 26.4 ± 11.3 0.009
CD4+PD-1+T cells Mean ± SD 9.6 ± 12.8 30.7 ± 24.3 36.91 ± 27.6 0.049
CD8+ T cells Mean ± SD 21.4 ± 1.4 16.5 ± 4.8 18.9 ± 10.3 0.036
CD8+PD-1+ T cells Mean ± SD 10.1 ± 6.03 19.8 ± 11.9 34.3 ± 26.6 0.027
CD11b+CD68+ M Mean ± SD 12.7 ± 2.3 21.3 ± 9.7 37.4 ± 23.6 0.004
NLR Mean ± SD 4.2 ± 1.5 6.0 ± 1.9 3.8 ± 1.5 0.06
MPR Mean ± SD 0.06 ± 0.01 0.053 ± 0.01 0.059 ± 0.02 0.4

 

↓  Table 7. Disturbances of Immune Cells According to Previous Surgery
 
Variable (mean ± SD) No surgery Radical surgery Palliative surgery P value
Data are expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed by Kruskal Wallis testa, and Robust test. PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1; M: macrophages; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; MPR: mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio; SD: standard deviation.
CD4+ T cells 23.2 ± 9.8 27.2 ± 4.8 36.6 ± 8.0 0.01
CD4+PD-1+ T cells 37.7 ± 25.1 33.7 ± 31.9 13.9 ± 12.9 0.1
CD8+ T cells 19.8 ± 8.6 20.1 ±2.2 14.2 ± 7.8 0.2
CD8+PD-1+ T cellsa 34.4 ± 26.6 12.92 ± 5.6 17.9 ± 7.3 0.045
CD11b+CD68+ M 37.4 ± 21.2 19.9 ± 10.4 15.2 ± 10.8 0.022
NLR 3.97 ± 1.6 6.6 ± 2.3 4.5 ± 1.04 0.016
MPR 0.059 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.01 0.3

 

↓  Table 8. Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors of PFS
 
Variable B Wald P value HR 95.0% CI for HR
Lower Upper
Data were analyzed using Cox regression using forward stepwise methods (likelihood ratio), HR = eB. HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PFS: progression-free survival.
Step 1 NLR 0.440 7.699 0.006 1.553 1.138 2.119
Step 2 Response 11.773 0.008
Complete response -3.144 10.762 0.001 0.043 0.007 0.282
Partial response -2.540 6.710 0.010 0.079 0.012 0.539
Stable disease -1.806 3.917 0.048 0.164 0.027 0.983
Progressive disease Reference
NLR 0.556 7.945 0.005 1.743 1.184 2.565