Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jocmr.elmerjournals.com

Original Article

Volume 17, Number 11, November 2025, pages 618-633


Evaluation of the Combined Use of Elastography and Cervicometry With the E-Cervix Index to Predict Second Trimester Preterm Birth Risk

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flowchart of patient selection and study procedures.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. E-Cervix screen for cervical stiffness assessment.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. ROC curves of cervical elastography parameters in the main group. ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. ROC curves for cervicometry and elastography parameter. ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Methods of ICI correction in the main group. ICI: isthmic-cervical insufficiency.

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Studied Pregnant Women
 
ParameterMain group (n = 150)Control group (n = 100)P-value
*P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Age data are presented as mean ± standard deviation with 95% CI; weight, height, and BMI as median (IQR); marital and social status as absolute numbers (percentage). No statistically significant differences were observed in comorbidities between groups. BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; IQR: interquartile range; UTI: urinary tract infection.
Age (years)30.24 ± 5.68 (29.32 - 31.16)32.17 ± 6.00 (30.98 - 33.36)0.011*
Weight (kg)61.50 (55.00 - 70.00)61.35 (55.00 - 71.75)0.944
Height (cm)164 (160 - 168)163 (160 - 170)0.664
BMI23.1 (20.8 - 25.8)22.2 (20.2 - 26.4)0.782
Marital status
  Married126 (84%)90 (90%)0.193
  Unmarried24 (16%)10 (10%)
Social status
  Housewives48 (68.6%)22 (31.4%)0.183
  Civil servants96 (56.1%)75 (43.9%)
  Students6 (66.7%)3 (33.3%)
Comorbidities
  Smoking8 (5.3%)6 (6.0%)0.812
  Alcohol use3 (2.0%)1 (1.0%)0.622
  Diabetes mellitus12 (8.0%)9 (9.0%)0.799
  Chronic infections (e.g., UTIs, hepatitis)15 (10.0%)12 (12.0%)0.691

 

Table 2. Clinical, Anamnestic, and Obstetric Characteristics
 
CategoryIndicatorMain group (n = 150)Control group (n = 100)P-value
*P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant difference between groups. Adjusted analyses (logistic regression) accounted for maternal age, smoking, diabetes, and infections. Significant associations remained robust after adjustment. BV: bacterial vaginosis; DEC: diagnostic evacuation curettage; OMT: organ malformation of the cervix; STIs: sexually transmitted infections.
Clinical conditionsExtragenital diseases52 (34.7%)45 (45.0%)0.001*
Threatening abortion/false contractions73 (48.7%)15 (15.0%)0.001*
Gynecological historyCervical polyp10 (6.7%)5 (5.0%)0.787
Erosion/ectropion of cervix (history)73 (48.7%)65 (65.0%)0.014*
Congenital anomaly of the cervix (OMT)18 (12.0%)6 (6.0%)0.130
Infections (BV, STIs, chorioamnionitis)25 (16.7%)22 (22.0%)0.323
Obstetric statusPrimigravida-primipara56 (53.8%)48 (46.2%)0.190
Multigravida-primipara41 (61.2%)26 (32.9%)
Multigravida-multipara53 (61.7%)26 (32.9%)
Burdened obstetric historySpontaneous miscarriage20 (74.1%)7 (25.9%)0.023*
Medical abortion24 (64.9%)13 (35.1%)0.791
Missed miscarriage32 (21.3%)10 (10.0%)0.019*
Ectopic pregnancy29 (19.3%)6 (6.0%)0.003*
Preterm birth45 (88.2%)6 (11.8%)0.001*
Previous operative interventionsCurettage of uterine cavity14 (9.3%)8 (8.0%)0.822
Cesarean section/myomectomy15 (10.0%)7 (7.0%)0.498
DEC10 (6.7%)7 (7.0%)1.000

 

Table 3. Cervical Length and Elastography Parameters
 
Measurement parametersMain group (mean ± SD)Control group (mean ± SD)
SD: standard deviation.
Cervical length, cm2.6 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.4
Elasticity contrast index6.5 ± 1.24.2 ± 0.9
Internal cervical os0.37 ± 0.100.55 ± 0.08
External cervical os0.32 ± 0.090.50 ± 0.07
Internal to external os stiffness ratio1.15 ± 0.31.10 ± 0.2

 

Table 4. Cervical Length and Elasticity Index by Age in Pregnant Women With and Without ICI
 
Age (years)Main group (n = 150)Control group (n = 100)
nCL, cm (Me, IQR)ECI (Me, IQR)nCL, cm (Me, IQR)ECI (Me, IQR)
CL: cervical length; ECI: elasticity contrast index; ICI: isthmic-cervical insufficiency; IQR: interquartile range; Me: median.
19 - 24232.51 (2.29 - 2.92)6.59 (6.25 - 7.10)123.06 (2.37 - 3.56)3.17 (2.01 - 3.80)
25 - 30472.63 (2.33 - 3.11)6.32 (6.20 - 6.69)243.21 (2.72 - 3.90)3.55 (2.95 - 4.28)
31 - 36612.56 (2.41 - 2.93)6.59 (6.25 - 6.93)413.77 (3.28 - 4.24)3.76 (3.25 - 4.38)
37 - 42152.87 (2.58 - 3.11)6.32 (6.20 - 6.70)193.72 (3.12 - 3.99)3.55 (2.85 - 4.36)
43 and older42.73 (2.04 - 3.31)6.22 (5.72 - 6.65)43.18 (1.57 - 3.98)3.96 (3.02 - 4.42)

 

Table 5. Predictive Accuracy of Elastography Parameters
 
ParameterAUCSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
Elasticity contrast index showed the strongest predictive value. Other indices such as cervical length, hardness ratio, and IOS/EOS separately had poor diagnostic performance (AUC ≤ 0.58). AUC: area under the curve; CL: cervical length; EOS: external cervical os; IOS: internal cervical os.
Elasticity contrast index0.898785
Stiffness coefficient0.858382
Internal to external os stiffness ratio0.827978
Other indices (CL, hardness ratio, IOS/EOS separate)≤ 0.58

 

Table 6. Methods of Correction in Pregnant Women With ICI (Main Group)
 
TypesMethods of correctionFrequency (%)
ICI: isthmic-cervical insufficiency.
Single methodsObstetric pessary20 (8%)
Surgical correction of ICI60 (24%)
Combined methodsObstetric pessary + progesterone preparations25 (10%)
Surgical correction of isthmic-cervical insufficiency of the cervix + obstetric pessary16 (6.4%)
Surgical correction of isthmic-cervical insufficiency of the cervix + progesterone preparations21 (8.4%)
Surgical correction of isthmic-cervical insufficiency of the cervix + obstetric pessary + progesterone preparations8 (3.2%)

 

Table 7. Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes and Neonatal Results in Women With and Without ICI
 
IndicatorsMain group (n = 150)Control group (n = 100)P-value
ICI: isthmic-cervical insufficiency.
Pregnancy outcomes
  Preterm birth, n (%)24 (16%)8 (8%)0.047
  Spontaneous labor, n (%)102 (68%)66 (66%)
  Prolonged pregnancy, n (%)24 (16%)26 (26%)
Neonatal outcomes
  Birth weight (kg, mean ± SD)2.8 ± 0.63.2 ± 0.5< 0.05
  Apgar score at 5 min (mean ± SD)7.5 ± 1.08.8 ± 0.7< 0.05
  Gestational age (weeks, mean ± SD)37 ± 338 ± 2< 0.05