Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jocmr.elmerjournals.com

Original Article

Volume 18, Number 4, April 2026, pages 271-281


Factors Predicting Diuretic Resistance in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Figures

↓  Figure 1. Study flowchart for patients selection and analysis.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. AUC result for the proposed diuretic resistance scoring system. AUC: area under the curve.
Figure 2.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Subjects
 
VariablesAll (N = 535)Patients with diuretic resistance (N = 365 (68.2%))Patients without diuretic resistance (N = 170 (31.8%))P-value
BUN: blood urea nitrogen; DM: diabetes mellitus; CAD: coronary artery disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; IV: intravenous; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; max: maximum; min: minimum; SD: standard deviation; TAPSE: tricuspud annular point of systolic excursion.
Age (years), median (min–max)58 (18–91)58 (18–81)61 (20–91)0.011
Gender
  Male, n (%)425 (79.4%)290 (79.5%)135 (79.4%)0.991
  Female, n (%)110 (20.6%)75 (20.5%)35 (20.6%)
DM, n (%)252 (47.1%)191 (52.3%)61 (35.9%)< 0.001
CAD, n (%)428 (80%)289 (79.2%)139 (81.8%)0.486
CKD, n (%)37 (6.9%)31 (8.5%)6 (3.5%)0.035
Usage of IV loop diuretics > 6 days216 ( 40.4%)175 (47.9%)41 (24.1%)< 0.001
Oral loop diuretic dose > 80 mg/day, n (%)44 (8.2%)43 (11.8%)1 (0.6%)< 0.001
Clinical parameters
  SBP (mm Hg), median (min–max)125 ± 24122 ± 23130 ± 25< 0.001
  DBP (mm Hg), median (min–max)76 ± 1575 ± 1479 ± 160.006
  LVEF (%), median (min–max)25 (13–79)23 (13–79)29 (14–77)< 0.001
  TAPSE (mm), median (min–max)16 (5–30)15 (5–30)17 (5–28)0.019
Laboratory values
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL), mean (SD)1.46 ± 0.631.54 ± 0.651.28 ± 0.57< 0.001
  GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), median (min–max)53 (16–146)50 (16–132)67 (17–146)< 0.001
  BUN (mg/dL), mean (SD)25 ± 1427 ± 1420 ± 12< 0.001
  Serum sodium (mmol/L), median (min–max)137 (111–150)136 (111–144)138 (118–150)< 0.001
  Serum potassium (mmol/L), mean (SD)4.0 ± 0.694.1 ± 0.74.0 ± 0.60.192
  Serum chloride (mmol/L), median (min–max)100 (78–111)98 (78–110)102 (82–111)< 0.001

 

↓  Table 2. Bivariate Analysis Result
 
VariableDiuretic resistancePOR95% CI
YesNo
N%N%MinimumMaximum
BUN: blood urea nitrogen; CAD: coronary artery disease; CI: confidence interval; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; DM: diabetes mellitus; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; TAPSE: tricuspud annular point of systolic excursion.
Age
  > 58 years19472.47427.60.0410.6790.4710.980
  ≤ 58 years171649636
Gender
  Male29068.313531.71.0001.0020.6391.572
  Female7567.93532.1
DM
  Yes19175.86124.2< 0.0011.9611.3482.853
  No17461.510938.5
CAD
  Yes28967.513932.50.5620.8480.5331.349
  No76713129
CKD
  Yes3183.8616.20.0432.5371.0386.202
  No3346716433
History of IV loop diuretic use > 6 days
  Yes175814119< 0.0012.8981.9294.354
  No19059.612940.4
Oral loop diuretic dose > 80 mg/day
  Yes4397.712.3< 0.00122.5683.081165.322
  No16934.432265.6
SBP
  < 90 mm Hg18756250.6541.4180.5533.639
  ≥ 90 mm Hg3476816432
DBP
  < 60 mm Hg4265.62234.40.6680.8750.5042.998
  ≥ 60 mm Hg32368.614831.4
LVEF
  ≤ 49%34870.214829.80.0013.0161.5815.756
  ≥ 50%1843.92356.1
TAPSE
  < 17 mm20972.18127.90.0411.4721.0212.122
  ≥ 17 mm15663.78936.3
Serum creatinine
  ≥ 1.5 mg/dL21062.712537.3< 0.0012.0501.3763.055
  < 1.5 mg/dL15577.54522.5
GFR
  ≤ 59 mL/min/1.73 m2233757825< 0.0012.0821.4393.013
  ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2132599241
BUN
  ≥ 21 mg/dL227805720< 0.0013.2612.2254.779
  < 21 mg/dL1385511345
Serum sodium
  < 135 mmol/L12278.23421.80.0022.0081.3013.100
  ≥ 135 mmol/L2436413636
Serum potassium
  < 3.5 mmol/L686635340.6380.8830.5601.393
  ≥ 3.5 mmol/L29768.813531.2
Serum chloride
  < 98 mmol/L15883.63116.4< 0.0013.4222.2025.319
  ≥ 98 mmol/L20759.813940.2

 

↓  Table 3. Final Model of Multivariate Analysis
 
VariableBP valueExp(B)95% CI
MinimumMaximum
B: coefficient B; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; CI: confidence interval; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; SE: standard error.
Diabetes mellitus0.5280.0131.6961.1202.570
History of IV loop diuretic use > 6 days0.7130.0022.0391.3063.184
Daily loop diuretic dosage > 80 mg2.8390.00617.1072.265129.177
LVEF ≤ 49%1.1590.0023.1861.5306.633
BUN ≥ 21 mg/dL0.907< 0.0012.4771.6413.740
Serum chloride < 98 mmol/L0.993< 0.0012.6991.6724.357

 

↓  Table 4. Scoring System Weighing
 
VariableBSEB/SE(B/SE)/2.491
B: coefficient B; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; SE: standard error.
Diabetes mellitus0.5280.2122.4911.0
History of IV loop diuretic use > 6 days0.7130.2273.1411.3
Daily loop diuretic dosage > 80 mg2.8391.0322.7511.1
LVEF ≤ 49%1.1590.3743.0991.2
BUN ≥ 21 mg/dL0.9070.2104.3191.7
Serum chloride < 98 mmol/L0.9930.2444.0701.6

 

↓  Table 5. Final Proposed Score Model
 
VariableScore
BUN: blood urea nitrogen; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction.
Diabetes mellitus1
History of IV loop diuretic use > 6 days1
Daily loop diuretic dosage > 80 mg1
LVEF ≤ 49%1
BUN ≥ 21 mg/dL2
Serum chloride < 98 mmol/L2
Total score8

 

↓  Table 6. Scoring System Interpretation
 
ScoreCriteriaProbability of diuretic resistance
1–3Low risk39–65%
4–6Moderate risk76–91%
7–8High risk95–96.4%