Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jocmr.elmerjournals.com

Original Article

Volume 18, Number 3, March 2026, pages 177-195


Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Strategy for Initial Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Figures

↓  Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram. PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Forest plot of all-cause mortality. CI: confidence interval.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. Subgroup analysis of all-cause mortality across multiple follow-up time points. CI: confidence interval.
Figure 3.
↓  Figure 4. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) for the incidence of all-cause mortality.
Figure 4.
↓  Figure 5. Forest plot of acute kidney injury. RCT: randomized controlled trial; CI: confidence interval.
Figure 5.
↓  Figure 6. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) for the incidence of acute kidney injury.
Figure 6.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Included Patients
 
Study IDGroupsPatient demographicsHemodynamic parameters, mean (SD)Focus of infection, n (%)Comorbidities, n (%)
Age (years), mean (SD)Weight (kg), mean (SD)Male, n (%)SOFA scoreLactate, mmol/LCreatinine (µmol/L)PulmonaryUrinary tractSkin or soft tissueDiabetesHypertensionCKD
Data are presented as: n (%) or mean (SD). NA: not available; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; CKD: chronic kidney disease; SD: standard deviation.
Andrews et al, 2017 [33]Restrictive fluid35.8 (11.9)NA55 (53.4)NA4.5 (3.3)141.5 (119.3)NA2 (1.9)NANANANA
Standard fluid37.5 (12.9)NA62 (58.5)NA5.4 (4.4)141.5 (88.4)NA2 (1.9)NANANANA
Boulet et al, 2024 [21]Restrictive fluid69.5 (8.8)67.7 (14.8)12 (50)NA2.4 (1.8)98.5 (52)12 (50)1 (4.2)1 (4.2)8 (33.3)14 (58.3)1 (4.2)
Standard fluid67.0 (11.5)73.4 (16.6)13 (54.2)NA2.2 (1.1)158.8 (47.6)11 (45.8)5 (16.7)1 (4.2)5 (20.8)11 (45.8)2 (8.3)
Meyhoff et al, 2022 [13]Restrictive fluid70 (11.4)78 (17)452 (59.9)NA4.1 (2.4)150.2 (84.8)209 (27.7)119 (15.8)62 (8.2)NA346 (45.8)9 (1.2)
Standard fluid69 (12.6)78.6 (17.8)452 (58.2)NA4.2 (2.4)153.8 (91)206 (26.5)133 (17.1)64 (8.2)NA360 (46.4)12 (1.5)
Shapiro et al, 2023 [14]Restrictive fluid59.1 (16)NA411 (52.6)3.4 (2.8)2.9 (2.5)159.12 (50.2)217 (27.7)148 (18.9)97 (12.4)222 (28.6)NA33 (4.2)
Standard fluid59.9 (15.9)NA415 (53.1)3.5 (2.7)2.9±2.4167.9 (167.9)205 (26.2)172 (22.0)82 (10.5)224 (29.0)NA40 (5.2)
Corl et al, 2019 [22]Restrictive fluid71 (16.7)87.7 (21.3)24 (43.6)8.7 (3)2.3 (1.7)NA13 (23.6)15 (27.3)8 (14.6)23 (41.8)NA7 (12.7)
Standard fluid69.5 (20.5)80.1 (17)26 (48.2)9.1 (3.8)3.2 (2.8)NA17 (31.5)14 (25.9)2 (3.7)18 (33.3)NA1 (1.9)
Douglas et al, 2020 [34]Restrictive fluid61.8 (16.9)73.7 (18.7)32 (38.6)NA3.6 (3.2)NANANANA29 (34.9)42 (50.6)NA
Standard fluid62.7 (15)73.6 (18.5)28 (68.3)NA3.8 (3.6)NANANANA11 (26.8)25 (61)NA
Jessen et al, 2022 [23]Restrictive fluid75.7 (13.7)77 (21.2)37 (61)2.7 (0.75)1.4 (0.6)98 (53.9)45 (74)9 (15)3 (5)11 (18)NA5 (8)
Standard fluid75.7 (11.3)78.7 (15.9)34 (55)2.7 (0.75)1.5 (0.8)96 (50.8)43 (69)12 (19)1 (2)9 (15)NA9 (15)
Kjaer et al, 2023 [24]Restrictive fluid70 (11.4)78 (17)452 (59.9)NA4.1 (2.4)150.2 (84.8)209 (27.7)119 (15.8)62 (8.2)NA346 (45.8)9 (1.2)
Standard fluid69 (12.6)78.6 (17.8)452 (58.2)NA4.2 (2.4)153.8 (91)206 (26.5)133 (17.1)64 (8.2)NA360 (46.4)12 (1.5)
Linden et al, 2024 [25]Restrictive fluid71.4 (16)82.7 (20.7)26 (57)10.4 (3.8)4.2 (3.1)172.4 (101)13 (28)12 (26)5 (11)NANANA
Standard fluid68.7 (13.7)78.7 (22.1)30 (61)9.4 (3.8)4 (2.7)172 (148.16)17 (35)7 (14)3 (6)NANANA
Macdonald et al, 2018 [26]Restrictive fluid65.4 (19.8)78 (16.7)31 (62)5.7 (4.5)2.1 (1.8)113.7 (64.8)14 (28)16 (32)6 (12)NANANA
Standard fluid62.4 (23.6)75.4 (19.8)30 (61)5.4 (2.2)1.8 (1)126.7 (68.7)20 (41)9 (18)6 (12)NANANA
Hu et al, 2023 [27]Restrictive fluid66.28 (16.66)NA67 (59.82)6.02 (2.97)NA147.29 (185.58)NANANANANANA
Standard fluid67.25 (19.41)NA77 (60.63)7.12 (2.99)NA94.03 (65.66)NANANANANANA
Jiang et al, 2023 [28]Restrictive fluid64.8 (12.7)NA96 (68.1)8.5 (3.4)3.1 (2.1)NA53 (37.6)18 (12.8)8 (5.7)29 (20.6)57 (40.4)NA
Standard fluid64.7 (13.8)NA61 (62.9)9.3 (3.2)3.9 (2.7)NA31 (32.0)5 (5.2)5 (5.2)30 (30.9)43 (44.3)NA
Li et al, 2025 [29]Restrictive fluid56.24 (9.79)NA24 (58.5)NANANA16 (39)NANA8 (19.5)19 (46.3)2 (4.9)
Standard fluid56.56 (12.07)NA26 (63.4)NANANA15 (36.6)NANANA22 (53.7)3 (7.3)
Rice et al, 2020 [30]Restrictive fluid71.2 (11.9)88.3 (27.1)28 (54.9)7 (4)NANANANANANANANA
Standard fluid72.5 (10.6)84.9 (23.1)27 (49.1)6 (4)NANANANANANANANA
Zhou et al, 2021 [32]Restrictive fluid40.19 (3.22)60.19 (2.39)30 (53.6)NANANA20 (35.7)NA14 (25)NANANA
Standard fluid39.98 (3.35)60.28 (2.31)40 (60.6)NANANA23 (34.8)NA13 (19.7)NANANA
Wang et al, 2021 [31]Restrictive fluid68.4 (15)NA78 (37)12.3 (2.9)4.8 (2.7)NA141 (67.4)7 (3.3)NA36 (17.3)48 (22.9)8 (3.8)
Standard-fluid69.6 (13)NA28 (30)12.3 (3.7)4.9 (2.5)NA58 (62.4)4 (4.3)NA17 (18.3)33 (35.5)3 (3.2)

 

↓  Table 2. Summary of the Included Studies
 
StudyStudy designCountryTime frameFollow-up (days)Sample sizeInclusion criteriaPrimary outcomes
TotalRestrictive strategyStandard care
LOS: length of stay; SIRS: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; SBP: systolic blood pressure; BP: blood pressure; ED: emergency department; ICU: intensive care unit; IV: intravenous; Sepsis-3: Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock; SCCM: Society of Critical Care Medicine; ESICM: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; APACHE II: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; MODS: multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; HR: heart rate; MAP: mean arterial pressure; CVP: central venous pressure; CO: cardiac output; SV: stroke volume; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; cTnI: cardiac troponin I; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-B-type brain natriuretic peptide; CRP: C-reactive protein.
Andrews et al, 2017 [33]Parallel-group, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial (RCT)ZambiaOctober 22, 2012, to November 11, 201328 days209103106Adults ≥ 18 years with sepsis (suspected infection + ≥ 2 SIRS criteria) and hypotension (SBP ≤ 90 mm Hg or MAP ≤ 65 mm Hg), enrolled within 4 h of the first eligible BP and within 24 h of ED registrationIn-hospital mortality
Boulet et al, 2024 [21]Single-blind, randomized, parallel, controlled pilot trialFranceSeptember 20, 2021, to February 25, 202328 days502426Adults 18–85 years, admitted to ICU with septic shock and within the first 24 h of vasopressor infusionCumulative fluid balance (mL/kg of admission body weight) in the first 5 days
Meyhoff et al, 2022 [13]Open label randomized clinical trial31 ICUs across Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Italy, Czech Republic, UK, and BelgiumNovember 27, 2018, to November 16, 202190 days1,545764781Adults ≥ 18 y in ICU with septic shock, received ≥ 1 L IV fluid in prior 24 h, onset of shock ≤ 12 h before screeningDeath from any cause within 90 days
Shapiro et al, 2023 [14]Randomized, unblinded superiority trialUSAMarch 7, 2018, to January 31, 202290 days1,563782781Adults ≥ 18 years with suspected or confirmed infection who had sepsis-induced hypotension, defined in the trial as systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg after administration of ≥ 1,000 mL IV fluidDeath from any cause before discharge home by day 90
Corl et al, 2019 [22]Prospective, randomized controlled trialUSANovember 2016 to February 201860 days1095554Adults admitted from the ED to the ICU with suspected severe sepsis or septic shock. After receiving a 1-L fluid bolus, they were included if they had persistent hypotension (MAP < 65 mm Hg) or lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L.30-day all-cause mortality
Douglas et al, 2020 [34]Prospective, multicenter, randomized, unblinded clinical trialUSA and UKOctober 2016 to February 201930 days1248341Adults presenting to ED with sepsis or septic shock (paper used SIRS-based sepsis criteria: ≥ 2 SIRS criteria + suspected/documented infection) and anticipated ICU admission; refractory hypotension defined as MAP ≤ 65 mm Hg after receiving ≥ 1 L and < 3 L of fluid; enrolment within 24 h of hospital arrivalDifference in positive fluid balance at 72 h or ICU discharge
Jessen et al, 2022 [23]Randomized, parallel-group, open-label feasibility trialDenmarkNovember 3, 2021, to December 18, 202190 days1236162Adult age ≥ 18 years; sepsis defined by suspected infection by treating clinician, blood cultures drawn, IV antibiotics given or planned, infection-related increase in SOFA ≥ 2; expected hospital stay > 24 hTotal volume of IV crystalloid fluids administered during the first 24 h
Kjaer et al, 2023 [24]Long-term follow of the CLASSIC trial31 ICUs across Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Italy, Czech Republic, UK and BelgiumNovember 27, 2018, to November 16, 2021365 days1,549767782Adults ≥18 years in ICU with septic shock, received ≥ 1 L IV fluid in prior 24 h, onset of shock ≤ 12 h before screeningDeath from any cause within 1 year
Linden et al, 2024 [25]Multicenter, parallel group, randomized feasibility trialSwedenMarch 7 and September 13, 202290 days984949Adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) with septic shock (suspected/confirmed infection, plasma lactate > 2 mmol/L, and infusion of vasopressor to maintain MAP > 65 mm Hg after adequate fluid resuscitation) within 12 h of admission to the ICU and ongoing vasopressor therapy at the time of inclusion were eligible for inclusionTotal volume of fluid administered within 3 days
Macdonald et al, 2018 [26]Multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trialAustraliaOctober 2016 to March 201890 days995049Adults with suspected infection requiring IV antibiotics and hypotension, defined as SBP < 100 mm Hg despite at least 1,000 mL isotonic crystalloid given within ≤ 1 h before randomization (SBP threshold was originally < 90 mm Hg, but changed to < 100 mm Hg early due to slow recruitmentCumulative total IV fluid volume administered at 6 h post-randomization
Hu et al, 2023 [27]Retrospective cohort studyChinaJanuary to September 202028 days239112127Adults ≥ 18 years, first onset, meeting the 2012 international guidelines diagnostic criteria for severe sepsis/septic shock, and no treatment contraindicationsICU stay time, ventilator use time, 28-day mortality, hemodynamic indices, APACHE II and SOFA scores, lactate clearance, complications (ARDS, acute renal failure, MODS), and myocardial injury markers
Jiang et al, 2023 [28]Retrospective cohort studyChinaJanuary 2019 to December 202290 days23814197Age ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with septic shock based on clinical, microbiologic, radiologic, or intraoperative findings, and required IV fluid resuscitation during the acute critical phaseIn-hospital mortality
Li et al, 2025 [29]Retrospective cohort studyChinaJanuary 2021 to December 202328 dayss824141Septic shock per Sepsis-3 SCCM/ESICM definition. Age 18–75 years; normal immune function; APACHE II ≥ 12; crystalloid fluid resuscitation required.28-day all-cause mortality, fluid infusion volume, and ICU LOS
Rice et al, 2020 [30]Retrospective cohort studyUSAOctober 1, 2016, to July 31, 201930 days1065155Adults ≥ 18 years with severe sepsis or septic shock, documented chronic kidney disease (CKD), and ≥ 1 episode of hypotension within 6 h of ED presentationTotal hospital LOS
Zhou et al, 2021 [32]Retrospective cohort studyChinaJanuary 2019 to January 202064 days1225666Clinical diagnosis of sepsis, complete medical records, ethics-approved management, and patient or family consentHemodynamic changes (HR, MAP, CVP), cardiac function (CO, SV, LVEF), biomarkers (cTnI, NT-proBNP, CRP), survival rate up to 64 days, and complication incidence
Wang et al, 2021 [31]Prospective cohort studyChinaMay 8, 2018, to June 15, 202128 days30220993Age ≥ 18 present with septic shock: infection + SOFA increase ≥ 2, and persistent hypotension needing vasopressors to maintain MAP > 65 mm Hg, and lactate > 2 mmol/L despite fluids28-day mortality