Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jocmr.elmerjournals.com

Original Article

Volume 18, Number 6, June 2026, pages 369-378


Quantitative Facet Joint Effusion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated With Dynamic Segmental Instability and Pain Severity in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Figures

↓  Figure 1. Lumbar spondylolisthesis ratio measurement.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Measurement of small joint effusion. Measurement of facet joint effusion width on axial T2-weighted MRI. The axial slice showing the largest facet joint space was selected and the maximal anteroposterior distance between opposing articular surfaces (white line/arrow) was measured perpendicular to the joint plane. The measured distance is reported as the maximum facet joint effusion width (mm). MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. ROC curves of facet joint effusion (FJE) width for predicting lumbar segmental instability. Left AUC = 0.9243; Right AUC = 0.9296 (P < 0.0001). AUC: area under the curve; ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 3.
↓  Figure 4. Linear regression of slip ratio against facet joint effusion (FJE) width for the left and right sides. Fitted equations: Left, Y = 2.673X + 4.339; Right, Y = 2.759X + 4.357.
Figure 4.
↓  Figure 5. Facet joint effusion (FJE) measurements in patients with lumbar segmental instability, comparing left and right sides with joint degeneration severity.
Figure 5.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Grade of Lumbar Facet Joint Degeneration
 
GradeCriteria
0Normal facet joint width (2–4 mm)
1Facet joint space narrowing, small osteophytes, and/or mild articular process hypertrophy
2Facet joint space narrowing, moderate osteophytes, moderate articular process hypertrophy, and/or small subarticular bone erosions
3Facet joint space narrowing, large osteophytes, severe articular process hypertrophy, subarticular bone erosions, and/or subchondral cyst formation

 

↓  Table 2. Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population by Lumbar Segmental Instability Status
 
VariableTotal (n = 151)LSI unstable (n = 72)LSI stable (n = 79)P value
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range, IQR) for continuous variables, and n (%) for categorical variables. Tests used: independent t-test for normally distributed continuous variables; Mann–Whitney U test (MW) for non-normal continuous variables; Pearson’s χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables as appropriate. P values two-sided. max FJE: maximum facet joint effusion (mm); LSI: lumbar segmental instability (LSI = 1: unstable; 0: stable). For reproducibility: dataset variable names are max_FJE and instability_bin. BMI: body mass index; FJE: facet joint effusion; LSI: lumbar spine instability; VAS: Visual Analog Scale.
Age, years64.52 ± 9.7663.81 ± 8.4765.16 ± 10.810.372
Sex, male, n (%)33/151 (21.85%)13/72 (18.06%)20/79 (25.32%)0.330
BMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD26.33 ± 4.2027.42 ± 4.1925.35 ± 4.000.002
Hypertension, n (%)61/151 (40.40%)36/72 (50%)25/79 (31.65%)0.030
Diabetes, n (%)57/151 (37.75%)32/72 (44.44%)25/79 (31.65%)0.077
Smoking, n (%)17/151 (11.26%)6/72 (8.33%)11/79 (13.92%)0.409
Alcohol, n (%)13/151 (8.61%)5/72 (6.94%)8/79 (10.13%)0.567
max FJE, mm, median (IQR)1.16 (2.78)2.81 (0.963)0.00 (0.500)< 0.001
FJE present, n (%)88/151 (58.28%)67/72 (93.06%)21/79 (26.59%)< 0.001
VAS, median (IQR)3 (2)5 (1)3 (1)< 0.001

 

↓  Table 3. Multivariable Logistic Regression for Predictors of Lumbar Segmental Instability
 
PredictorCoefficient (β)SEOR95% CIP value
Model: multivariable binary logistic regression with dependent variable LSI (unstable = 1, stable = 0). max FJE entered as continuous (mm). OR = exp(β). Model diagnostics performed: assessed linearity in the logit for continuous predictors, multicollinearity (variance inflation factor), goodness-of-fit (Hosmer–Lemeshow), and discrimination (AUC). BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; FJE: facet joint effusion; OR: odds ratio; SE: standard error.
Intercept−2.8632.898--0.323
max FJE (per 1 mm)1.8250.2686.203.67–10.48< 0.001
Sex (male vs. female)0.0470.8871.050.18–5.970.958
Age (per year)−0.00780.0310.990.93–1.050.801
BMI (per kg/m2)0.01020.0711.010.88–1.160.886
Hypertension (yes vs. no)0.6830.6241.980.58–6.720.274
Diabetes (yes vs. no)0.4810.6121.620.49–5.370.432
Smoking (yes vs. no)−0.9251.1270.400.04–3.610.412
Alcohol (yes vs. no)0.5761.1571.780.18–17.190.619

 

↓  Table 4. The Number and Amount of Joint Effusions in Segments With Segmental Instability of Slippage
 
Number of joint effusions (151)LSI (72)Non-LSI (79)P
LSI: lumbar spine instability.
Left66/7217/79
  Number
  Effusions width (mm)2.80 ± 0.901.31 ± 1.32< 0.001
Right66/7218/79
  Number
  Effusions width (mm)2.70 ± 0.881.20 ± 1.22< 0.001
Bilateral67/7221/79
  Number
  Effusions width (mm)2.75 ± 0.891.25 ± 1.25< 0.001

 

↓  Table 5. Grading of Small Joint Degeneration and Amount of Joint Effusion
 
GradeNumber of FJE/degenerated jointsEffusions width (mm)VAS
FJE: facet joint effusion; VAS: Visual Analog Scale.
1Left18/212.49 ± 0.843.77 ± 0.99
Right18/342.07 ± 1.27
2Left37/582.84 ± 1.423.86 ± 1.29
Right50/622.73 ± 0.96
3Left28/622.04 ± 0.763.44 ± 1.16
Right16/551.62 ± 1.05