Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jocmr.elmerjournals.com

Original Article

Volume 18, Number 9, September 2026, pages 599-611


Cytochrome P450 2D6 Metabolizer Phenotype Is Associated With Metoprolol Pharmacodynamics But Not With Metoprolol Discontinuation: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the All of Us Research Program

Figures

↓  Figure 1. CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype and metoprolol discontinuation. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for metoprolol discontinuation, with death treated as a competing event and the normal metabolizer as reference. Shown are the primary phenotype contrasts (poor, intermediate, and ultrarapid metabolizers vs normal metabolizers) under the terminal-gap discontinuation definition, the collapsed reduced-metabolizer contrast (poor plus intermediate vs normal), and the poor-metabolizer estimate under two alternative discontinuation definitions (90-day assumed supply and first gap of at least 30 days). The x-axis is on the log scale; the dashed line marks the null (HR = 1.0). All estimates include the null. IM: intermediate metabolizer; NM: normal metabolizer; PM: poor metabolizer; UM: ultrarapid metabolizer.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Pharmacodynamic response by CYP2D6 phenotype. Adjusted associations between metabolizer phenotype and four pharmacodynamic outcomes, with the normal metabolizer as reference: (a) attained on-treatment heart rate (mean difference in beats/min), (b) bradycardia (odds ratio), (c) attained maximum daily dose (mean difference in mg), and (d) attainment of target dose (odds ratio). Estimates are shown for ultrarapid, intermediate, and poor metabolizers; the reference (normal metabolizer) is marked at the null (0 for mean differences, 1 for odds ratios). Teal indicates P < 0.05; gray indicates a non-significant estimate. Attained heart rate decreases monotonically with decreasing metabolizing capacity. CYP2D6: cytochrome P450 2D6; IM: intermediate metabolizer; NM: normal metabolizer; PM: poor metabolizer; UM: ultrarapid metabolizer.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. Reduced-metabolizer status and metoprolol discontinuation, by genetic ancestry. Within-stratum cause-specific HRs for the reduced-metabolizer contrast (poor plus intermediate vs normal metabolizers) across six genetic-ancestry groups, listed in the same order as Table 1, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); marker area is proportional to random-effects weight. The South Asian stratum (amber) is the source of the significant between-stratum heterogeneity (I2 = 64.7%; Cochran Q P = 0.01) and, given its small size (n = 215), is interpreted as hypothesis-generating. The diamond shows the DerSimonian–Laird random-effects pooled estimate (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95–1.08). The x-axis is on the log scale; the dashed line marks the null (HR = 1.0). HR: hazard ratios.
Figure 3.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Ancestry-Stratified Reduced-Metabolizer Contrast (PM + IM vs NM)
 
Genetic ancestryNEventsHR (95% CI)
Between-stratum heterogeneity: I2 = 64.7%; Cochran Q P = 0.01. Random-effects (DerSimonian–Laird) pooled HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.95–1.08). The significant heterogeneity was driven by the small South Asian stratum; a fixed-effect pooled estimate is not an appropriate summary (see Results). Because the strata are mutually exclusive groups within a single cohort, the Cochran Q test is the formal test of effect modification of the reduced-metabolizer contrast by genetic ancestry. Strata are listed alphabetically, and Figure 3 uses the same order. CI: confidence interval; HR: cause-specific hazard ratio; IM: intermediate metabolizer; NM: normal metabolizer; PM: poor metabolizer.
African6,5944,6310.98 (0.93–1.04)
Admixed American4,9263,5640.98 (0.92–1.05)
East Asian5433620.97 (0.78–1.19)
European30,89220,3791.02 (0.99–1.05)
Middle Eastern110831.24 (0.77–1.98)
South Asian2151511.87 (1.31–2.68)

 

↓  Table 2. Baseline Characteristics of the Discontinuation-Eligible Cohort, by CYP2D6 Metabolizer Phenotype
 
CharacteristicPM (n = 2,470)IM (n = 16,687)NM (n = 24,123)UM (n = 1,205)Max SMD
aGenetic-ancestry proportions differ across metabolizer groups by design, because CYP2D6 allele and phenotype frequencies vary by ancestral population; this structure motivated adjustment for genetic-ancestry principal components in all models and the ancestry-stratified analysis (Table 1), and it is not a balance failure. bBaseline heart rate was measured before metoprolol exposure and was used as a precision covariate only in the attained heart-rate model; it was not used as an adjustment covariate in the discontinuation or dose models (see Methods). The “Max SMD” column reports, for each categorical variable, the maximum absolute SMD across its categories versus normal metabolizers. The maximum SMD across the adjustment covariates (age, sex, indication, comorbidity, cotherapy, CYP2D6 inhibitor exposure, calendar year, and EHR density) was 0.089, indicating good balance across phenotype groups. Genetic ancestry is shown for cohort description and is excluded from this balance statement for the reason given above. Sex categories reflect the sex value recorded in the EHR; participants without a recorded value are shown as unknown or not reported. Rows reported as a single value followed by a percent sign indicate the percentage of participants within that phenotype column who have the characteristic; the denominators are the column Ns given in the header. Rows reported as n (%) give the count followed by the within-column percentage. AV: atrioventricular; bpm: beats per minute; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EHR: electronic health record; IM: intermediate metabolizer; NM: normal metabolizer; PM: poor metabolizer; SMD: standardized mean difference; UM: ultrarapid metabolizer; CYP2D6: cytochrome P450 2D6; SD: standard deviation; Max: maximum.
Age at index, mean (SD), years60.3 (13.5)59.7 (13.8)59.1 (13.7)58.9 (14.2)0.086
Sex, n (%)0.023
  Female1,287 (52.1)8,747 (52.4)12,476 (51.7)627 (52.0)
  Male1,144 (46.3)7,634 (45.7)11,275 (46.7)556 (46.1)
  Unknown or not reported39 (1.6)306 (1.8)372 (1.5)22 (1.8)
Genetic ancestry, n (%)a0.444
  European2,121 (85.9)12,477 (74.8)16,294 (67.5)705 (58.5)
  African172 (7.0)2,409 (14.4)4,013 (16.6)270 (22.4)
  Admixed American170 (6.9)1,484 (8.9)3,272 (13.6)207 (17.2)
  East Asian1 (0.0)217 (1.3)325 (1.3)2 (0.2)
  South Asian4 (0.2)62 (0.4)149 (0.6)8 (0.7)
  Middle Eastern2 (0.1)38 (0.2)70 (0.3)13 (1.1)
Baseline heart rate, mean (SD), bpmb77.2 (13.1)78.2 (13.7)78.4 (13.5)77.9 (13.0)0.089
EHR density, mean (SD)16.4 (22.0)16.2 (21.9)16.3 (21.7)16.5 (22.7)0.006
Follow-up, mean (SD), days1,525.3 (1,736.0)1,580.7 (1,807.7)1,552.7 (1,793.5)1,597.4 (1,830.8)0.025
Calendar year of index, mean (SD)2,017.2 (5.1)2,017.1 (5.2)2,017.2 (5.2)2,016.8 (5.2)0.077
Chronic kidney disease, %38.639.440.542.90.049
COPD or asthma, %38.739.940.140.90.029
Diabetes, %40.041.644.145.80.083
Prior bradyarrhythmia, %21.519.218.016.40.088
AV-nodal blocking cotherapy, %12.512.012.713.50.026
Concomitant strong CYP2D6 inhibitor exposure, %10.19.18.89.30.047
Concomitant moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor exposure, %6.05.85.74.10.074
Metoprolol indication, n (%)0.072
 Heart failure797 (32.3)5,438 (32.6)8,153 (33.8)411 (34.1)
 Hypertension770 (31.2)5,099 (30.6)7,433 (30.8)353 (29.3)
 Atrial fibrillation395 (16.0)2,548 (15.3)3,460 (14.3)150 (12.4)
 Acute myocardial infarction139 (5.6)1,106 (6.6)1,544 (6.4)90 (7.5)
 Angina142 (5.7)942 (5.6)1,388 (5.8)91 (7.6)
 Other or unknown227 (9.2)1,554 (9.3)2,145 (8.9)110 (9.1)

 

↓  Table 3. CYP2D6 Metabolizer Phenotype and Metoprolol Discontinuation: Primary and Sensitivity Analyses (Cause-Specific Cox Regression)
 
Analysis/definitionNEvents (rate)ContrastHR (95% CI)P value
Death (629 events; 1.4%) was treated as a competing event and censored in the cause-specific models. Crude discontinuation under the primary definition was 67.4% (29,170 of 43,280) among poor, intermediate, and normal metabolizers combined and 68.8% (829 of 1,205) among ultrarapid metabolizers. The eligibility requirement for at least two dispensings defines the target population as patients who continued beyond a first fill (see Methods and Limitations). CI: confidence interval; HR: cause-specific hazard ratio; IM: intermediate metabolizer; NM: normal metabolizer; PM: poor metabolizer; UM: ultrarapid metabolizer; CYP2D6: cytochrome P450 2D6.
Primary (terminal-gap)44,48529,999 (67.4%)PM vs NM1.04 (0.99–1.09)0.12
IM vs NM1.01 (0.99–1.03)0.41
UM vs NM1.01 (0.94–1.08)0.89
Reduced metabolizer43,28029,170 (67.4%)PM + IM vs NM1.01 (0.99–1.04)0.24
Sensitivity: 90-day assumed supply43,33630,504 (70.4%)PM vs NM1.02 (0.97–1.07)0.40
IM vs NM1.00 (0.98–1.03)0.86
UM vs NM0.99 (0.92–1.06)0.75
Sensitivity: first gap (≥ 30 days)43,33642,556 (98.2%)PM vs NM1.01 (0.97–1.05)0.68
IM vs NM1.01 (0.99–1.03)0.52
UM vs NM1.04 (0.98–1.11)0.17

 

↓  Table 4. CYP2D6 Metabolizer Phenotype and Pharmacodynamic Secondary Outcomes
 
Outcome (model)ContrastEstimate (95% CI)P value
aThe attained heart-rate model additionally adjusted for baseline (pre-exposure) heart rate. No adjustment for multiple comparisons was applied; the contrasts that survive a Bonferroni correction across the 12 secondary comparisons are identified in the Results. CI: confidence interval; IM: intermediate metabolizer; NM: normal metabolizer; OR: odds ratio; PM: poor metabolizer; UM: ultrarapid metabolizer; CYP2D6: cytochrome P450 2D6.
Attained on-treatment heart rate, bpm (linear)aPM vs NM−1.85 (−2.36 to −1.34)< 0.001
IM vs NM−0.84 (−1.09 to −0.60)< 0.001
UM vs NM+0.79 (0.07 to 1.51)0.03
Bradycardia (logistic), ORPM vs NM1.19 (1.05–1.36)0.009
IM vs NM1.16 (1.09–1.23)< 0.001
UM vs NM0.95 (0.78–1.16)0.62
Attained maximum daily dose, mg (linear)PM vs NM−5.28 (−12.67 to 2.11)0.16
IM vs NM−6.68 (−10.26 to −3.09)< 0.001
UM vs NM+13.33 (2.92 to 23.75)0.01
Reached target dose (logistic), ORPM vs NM0.96 (0.83–1.10)0.55
IM vs NM0.91 (0.85–0.97)0.006
UM vs NM1.28 (1.07–1.54)0.008